Friends, for the Friday lecture in Oxford, we had to change venue to the largest one, the Sheldonian (capacity 1,000). There are a few seats left (27). This talk will be different from others, as I will integrate fractal richness in the texture of life.
http://btlecture.eventbrite.co.uk/
BT Centre Lecture to be given by Nassim N. Taleb
Antifragile: How to Live and Manage in a World We Don’t Understand. Everything in life has nonlinear responses, from medical treatments to project management. The talk introduces the concept of fragility and
Category Archives: Contributors
Nassim Nicholas Taleb | The age of black swans – Livemint
The highlight of 2012 for me was when, during a difficult moment, I received a message of encouragement from a firefighter.
His point was that he found my ideas on tail risk extremely easy to understand. His question was: How come risk gurus, academics, and financial modellers don’t get it?
Well, the answer is right there, staring at me, in the message itself. The fellow is a firefighter; he cannot afford to misunderstand risk. He is the one who would be directly harmed by his error. In other words, he has skin in the game. And, in addition, he is honourable, risking his life for no bonus.
This idea of skin in the game is central to the proper functioning of a complex world. In an opaque system, alas, there is an incentive for operators to hide risk, taking upside without downside. And there is no possible risk-management method that can replace skin in the game—particularly when informational opacity is compounded by informational asymmetry, along with what economists call the principal-agent problem.
via Nassim Nicholas Taleb | The age of black swans – Livemint.
Correcting Myths: Phony is OK, Harmful Phony is the one to watch for.
Correcting Myths: Phony is OK, Harmful Phony is the one to watch for.
http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/myths.htm
– Golden rule: one is not ethically allowed to tells others what to do unless he is doing it himself, and can suffer harm in case it turns out to be a bad advice. Predictors should be harmed by their prediction errors if these stand to hurt others. As such I cannot give advice, I can only tell readers what I do. Likewise, I cannot tell people what I predict, I can just describe my portfolio. This rule prevents people from being harmful phonies.
I wonder why all these political/economic thinkers…
I wonder why all these political/economic thinkers can’t make simple logical step, from a) “politicians are [incompetent/corrupt/self-serving, etc.]” b) they seem to have been that way across history and geography, to the obvious “we need a mechanism to gain from the [incompetence/corruption/…] of politicians”. Why do these small logical steps elude intellectuals?
The press is making us mistake a mouse for an elephant…
The press is making us mistake a mouse for an elephant, and an elephant for a mouse. Today, in the U.S., many more people are dying from overfeeding than underfeeding, many more people are killed by excessive comfort than discomfort, and for all the evil of the gun lobby, firearms harm much, much fewer people (<1%) than the corn syrup, cereal, wheat, and orange juice industries. I cannot believe that, in the 21st century, “intelligent” people would mistake the lurid for the statistical.