Having money is like having an army. You want to have it and you don’t want to use it.
(Modification of previous aphorism)
via Having money is like having an army. You… – Nassim Nicholas Taleb | Facebook.
Having money is like having an army. You want to have it and you don’t want to use it.
(Modification of previous aphorism)
via Having money is like having an army. You… – Nassim Nicholas Taleb | Facebook.
The absurdity of money is that it is only good for you if you don’t spend it.
via The absurdity of money is that it is… – Nassim Nicholas Taleb | Facebook.
All rules have exceptions including this one.
via All rules have exceptions including this… – Nassim Nicholas Taleb | Facebook.
When someone says about a paper “there is nothing deep or new”, it means that 1) it is deep, 2) it is new, & more importantly 3) it is right. When there is nothing deep or new people say nothing.
via When someone says about a paper “there… – Nassim Nicholas Taleb | Facebook.
Why I find it unethical to cite books you haven’t read that you see mentioned in other books. This is an example from the Dobelli case but it is general. I spent 2 years reading books and papers on the history of medicine, taking notes. Then cited the author. About 60 hours of work for 1 citation. Dobelli mentions my argument, cuts/pastes the citation from my text, then cites him separately (in a discussion that is overall exposition of my argument). The argument would be “it is not your text, but Burch”. It is. The work of a researcher should be respected.
(Note that I kept reading until “saturation” of finding same points shared by many authors, then stopped” The only ambiguous point is what is found on Wikipedia: does one cite Wikipedia? What if the page changes?