JUMPS DO NOT ALWAYS NEED ENERGY.
For antifragile matters in the nonphysical (i.e., socio-economic) domain, Thom’s Catastrophe Theory does not make a difference. What matters is convexity or concavity, period.
This graph gives the intuition behind my need to separate my idea of antifragility from conventional physics. Social science is a complete different animal.

[Removed my last post wishing Saudis rioters good luck (for attempt at “day of rage” etc.) & posts that that have perishable nature to them: (can be read next year (or next decade) without any loss of relevance). Everything I post (write, publish) need to meet the nonperishability criterion.]

‫قلبي معكم
My thoughts are with the Saudi protesters tomorrow.‬

Technical Proof of Leverage leading to Fat Tails (uninteresting to those who do not need convincing)- Note 141

http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/notebook.htm

Opacity
www.fooledbyrandomness.com
(A philosophical notebook. I only put stuff here from my work in progresss. Once again, I beg you to avoid sending me the list of typos. Not quite my book… but close. And I am not so much anti-Platonic: I am mostly against “Platonicity” which is being a sucker for a Platonic form, at the cost