Let me try again. In India last week dined with a sage, former economist (Indian wine Suda & Grower). We converged on the following layering: 1- talking. 2- doing. 3- being.
Corrolary: for 3, change the arrow. You are not good (or bad) because you are doing good (or bad), but you are doing good (or bad) because you are good (or bad).
Let me try again. In India last week dined with a sage, former economist (Indian wine Suda & Grower). We converged on the following layering: 1- talking. 2- doing. 3- being.
Corrolary: for 3, change the arrow. You are not good (or bad) because you are doing good (or bad), but you are doing good (or bad) because you are good (or bad).
Leave a reply